Photo Feedback

The original image as presented for feedback.

It's a great shot, isn't it! I think our Anonymous Photographer is showing off because there's not much that needs to be done to this image. The exposure is excellent with detail in both the highlights and shadows, the framing is tight and appropriate, and I like the wide frame which lets the eye dance across the rocks and the separating streams of water.

So, what would I do? I don't think you need to do anything, but you could explore directing the eye a little more. The differences between the two reproductions here might not show up on your computer monitor clearly, but the idea is to introduce a little more drama by darkening the background a hint more, and then adding a little more contrast to the foreground rocks, just to bring them forward.

Well captured and presented.

And if you're interested in a photography workshop in the next 12 months or so, I have places left on trips going to the New Zealand ‘Middlehurst’, Antarctica, Canada, USA, Iran and Bolivia. Full details on the Better Photography website!

 

The original image as presented for feedback.

 

Our Anonymous Photographer was up early, but only one horse paid him or her any attention! There's some rising mist in the middle ground which is full of potential, but the sky is pretty bright and distracting, so our Anonymous Photographer went to work and produced the following:

 

 

The photographer should be commended for balancing the sky down so that it isn't so distracting, but could our Anonymous perpetrator have done even more? 

 

 

Here's my take on the image, beginning with an evening out of the tonal values in both the foreground and background. 

 

 

From here, I have darkened down the top and bottom a little further, and then lightened up the middle ground and added a little more contrast. Not a great difference between my edit and the Anonymous Photographer, so I am in good company, but perhaps mine is a bit lighter. Was the photographer's monitor correctly calibrated I wonder?

 

 

So, where to next? What about cropping a bit more of the sky off? It brings attention down to the horses, but the bright sky is still a distraction.

 

 

What about cropping the bright sky out all together, just keeping the clouds, although this leaves the lone tree to become a distraction instead...

 

 

So, let's crop a bit more and now we have a much simpler image with just the horses and the tree in the mist. I like this personally, but I might have taken my 'feedback' a bit far because now this is no longer the Anonymous Photographer's interpretation. And perhaps the image is a little long and narrow.

 

 

As a penultimate suggestion, the very top of the image was extended (stretched) upwards, just because the previous step looked a little severely cropped. Photoshop was used to select the top 20% and using the transform tool, stretch this section up which I'm sure the casual observer would not object to.

 

 

Now that the sky has been removed, I feel the image is lacking in contrast, so an auto levels was applied to give the final image a little lift.

The original image as presented for feedback.

 

Our Anonymous Photographer this week demonstrates a common problem faced by landscape and travel photographers with alarming regularity. Indeed, there is undoubtedly a plot by Mother Nature to frustrate photographers by producing the most amazing sunrises and sunsets, exactly at a time when there is nothing in the foreground that works to create a great composition.

 

For instance, the landscape seen below this amazing sky has all the necessarily elements - a meandering stream, distant mountains and lush, green foliage, but they are not necessarily sitting together in a balanced composition. And annoyingly, the best part of the sky is off to the left and doesn't really fit the landscape below it - at least not from this vantage point.

 

Okay, so the obvious thing for me to say is, find a better vantage point when the sky turns on a show like this, and the Anonymous Photographer would quite rightly counter that that's easier said than done. And by the time you find a better vantage point, the sky has changed and the moment passed.

 

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

 

So, I have no solution for this except to commisserate. With the file as submitted, there's not a lot we can do, but here are some minor suggestions. First, let's simplify the composition by removing the tree on the right, but keeping the moon in position.

 

 

The exposure is too dark for the foreground, so let's lighten that up next. 

 

 

Finally, let's darken down the light tree tips along the bottom right and the edges of the bottom left as well, just to contain the frame.

 

 

That's a little better and the overall image could be lighter still at the risk of losing some of the mood. 

 

So what's the solution? If you have a few great locations near your home that just need a good sky, keep them in mind for when you see the sky about to explode. Otherwise, just keep at it because eventually, Mother Nature relents and it all comes together! 

 

Our e-book on How To Win Photo Competitions isn't just for making better competition entries, it's full of great advice on improving all your photos - you can find it here.

S5 Box

Login

S5 Register